Mission NewEnergy Limited

Overview

  • Founded Date March 9, 1917
  • Sectors Sales & Marketing
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 9
Bottom Promo

Company Description

Jatropha: the Biofuel that Bombed Seeks a Path To Redemption

If you liked this story, share it with other individuals.

Earlier this century, jatropha was hailed as a “wonder” biofuel. A simple shrubby tree native to Central America, it was hugely promoted as a high-yielding, drought-tolerant biofuel feedstock that could grow on abject lands across Latin America, Africa and Asia.

A jatropha rush ensued, with more than 900,000 hectares (2.2 million acres) planted by 2008. But the bubble burst. Low yields led to plantation failures almost all over. The consequences of the jatropha crash was tainted by allegations of land grabbing, mismanagement, and overblown carbon decrease claims.

Today, some researchers continue pursuing the incredibly elusive pledge of high-yielding jatropha. A return, they state, is dependent on breaking the yield issue and addressing the hazardous land-use issues linked with its original failure.

The sole staying large jatropha plantation remains in Ghana. The plantation owner declares high-yield domesticated ranges have been attained and a new boom is at hand. But even if this return falters, the world’s experience of jatropha holds crucial lessons for any appealing up-and-coming biofuel.

At the start of the 21st century, Jatropha curcas, an unassuming shrub-like tree native to Central America, was planted across the world. The rush to jatropha was driven by its promise as a sustainable source of biofuel that might be grown on degraded, unfertile lands so as not to displace food crops. But inflated claims of high yields failed.

Now, after years of research study and advancement, the sole remaining large plantation concentrated on growing jatropha is in Ghana. And Singapore-based jOil, which owns that plantation, declares the jatropha return is on.

“All those business that stopped working, adopted a plug-and-play model of hunting for the wild varieties of jatropha. But to commercialize it, you require to domesticate it. This belongs of the process that was missed out on [throughout the boom],” jOil CEO Vasanth Subramanian told Mongabay in an interview.

Having gained from the errors of jatropha’s past failures, he states the oily plant could yet play a key function as a liquid biofuel feedstock, decreasing transport carbon emissions at the global level. A brand-new boom could bring fringe benefits, with jatropha likewise a prospective source of fertilizers and even bioplastics.

But some scientists are hesitant, noting that jatropha has already gone through one hype-and-fizzle cycle. They caution that if the plant is to reach complete capacity, then it is vital to find out from previous errors. During the very first boom, jatropha plantations were hampered not just by bad yields, but by land grabbing, deforestation, and social issues in nations where it was planted, including Ghana, where jOil runs.

Experts likewise suggest that jatropha’s tale offers lessons for scientists and entrepreneurs exploring appealing new sources for liquid biofuels – which exist aplenty.

Miracle shrub, major bust

Jatropha’s early 21st-century appeal stemmed from its guarantee as a “second-generation” biofuel, which are sourced from yards, trees and other plants not derived from edible crops such as maize, soy or oil palm. Among its several purported virtues was a capability to grow on abject or “marginal” lands; therefore, it was declared it would never take on food crops, so the theory went.

At that time, jatropha ticked all the boxes, states Alexandros Gasparatos, now at the University of Tokyo’s Institute for Future Initiatives. “We had a crop that appeared amazing; that can grow without excessive fertilizer, a lot of pesticides, or excessive need for water, that can be exported [as fuel] abroad, and does not take on food since it is harmful.”

Governments, global companies, financiers and companies purchased into the buzz, introducing initiatives to plant, or promise to plant, millions of hectares of jatropha. By 2008, plantations covered some 900,000 hectares (2.2 million acres) in Latin America, Africa and Asia, according to a market study prepared for WWF.

It didn’t take wish for the mirage of the incredible biofuel tree to fade.

In 2009, a Pals of the Earth report from Eswatini (still known at the time as Swaziland) cautioned that jatropha’s high demands for land would undoubtedly bring it into direct conflict with food crops. By 2011, a global evaluation kept in mind that “growing exceeded both scientific understanding of the crop’s capacity along with an understanding of how the crop fits into existing rural economies and the degree to which it can flourish on minimal lands.”

Projections approximated 4.7 million hectares (11.7 million acres) would be planted by 2010, and 12.8 million hectares (31.6 million acres) by 2015. However, only 1.19 million hectares (2.94 million acres) were growing by 2011. Projects and plantations began to fail as anticipated yields refused to materialize. Jatropha could grow on degraded lands and endure drought conditions, as claimed, but yields stayed bad.

“In my opinion, this combination of speculative financial investment, export-oriented capacity, and potential to grow under reasonably poorer conditions, developed a really huge issue,” leading to “ignored yields that were going to be produced,” Gasparatos says.

As jatropha plantations went from boom to bust, they were also plagued by environmental, social and financial troubles, say experts. Accusations of land grabs, the conversion of food crop lands, and cleaning of natural locations were reported.

Studies discovered that land-use modification for jatropha in nations such as Brazil, Mexico and Tanzania resulted in a loss of biodiversity. A research study from Mexico discovered the “carbon repayment” of jatropha plantations due to involved forest loss varied between 2 and 14 years, and “in some situations, the carbon debt might never ever be recovered.” In India, production showed carbon benefits, however using fertilizers led to increases of soil and water “acidification, ecotoxicity, eutrophication.”

“If you look at many of the plantations in Ghana, they declare that the jatropha produced was located on limited land, but the concept of marginal land is really elusive,” discusses Abubakari Ahmed, a speaker at the University for Development Studies, Ghana. He studied the ramifications of jatropha plantations in the nation over several years, and found that a lax definition of “limited” indicated that presumptions that the land co-opted for jatropha plantations had been lying untouched and unused was frequently illusory.

“Marginal to whom?” he asks. “The fact that … currently no one is using [land] for farming does not indicate that nobody is utilizing it [for other functions] There are a great deal of nature-based livelihoods on those landscapes that you may not necessarily see from satellite imagery.”

Learning from jatropha

There are essential lessons to be found out from the experience with jatropha, state experts, which ought to be heeded when considering other advantageous second-generation biofuels.

“There was a boom [in investment], however regrettably not of research, and action was taken based upon alleged advantages of jatropha,” says Bart Muys, a professor in the Division of Forest, Nature and Landscape at the University of Leuven, Belgium. In 2014, as the jatropha hype was unwinding, Muys and colleagues published a paper pointing out key lessons.

Fundamentally, he explains, there was a lack of understanding about the plant itself and its requirements. This vital requirement for upfront research study might be used to other prospective biofuel crops, he says. In 2015, for instance, his group launched a paper analyzing the yields of pongamia (Millettia pinnata), a “fast-growing, leguminous and multipurpose tree types” with biofuel guarantee.

Like jatropha, pongamia can be grown on degraded and minimal land. But Muys’s research study revealed yields to be highly variable, contrary to other reports. The team concluded that “pongamia still can not be thought about a considerable and stable source of biofuel feedstock due to continuing knowledge gaps.” Use of such cautionary information could avoid inefficient financial speculation and negligent land conversion for brand-new biofuels.

“There are other very promising trees or plants that could serve as a fuel or a biomass manufacturer,” Muys states. “We wished to avoid [them going] in the very same instructions of early buzz and fail, like jatropha.”

Gasparatos underlines crucial requirements that must be fulfilled before moving ahead with new biofuel plantations: high yields should be opened, inputs to reach those yields understood, and a ready market must be readily available.

“Basically, the crop needs to be domesticated, or [scientific understanding] at a level that we understand how it is grown,” Gasparatos says. Jatropha “was virtually undomesticated when it was promoted, which was so odd.”

How biofuel lands are obtained is likewise essential, states Ahmed. Based upon experiences in Ghana where communally used lands were purchased for production, authorities need to guarantee that “guidelines are put in place to inspect how massive land acquisitions will be done and documented in order to reduce a few of the problems we observed.”

A jatropha return?

Despite all these challenges, some scientists still think that under the best conditions, jatropha could be a valuable biofuel service – especially for the difficult-to-decarbonize transport sector “responsible for roughly one quarter of greenhouse gas emissions.”

“I believe jatropha has some possible, but it needs to be the ideal material, grown in the ideal place, and so on,” Muys said.

Mohammad Alherbawi, a postdoctoral research fellow at Qatar’s Hamad Bin Khalifa University, continues holding out hope for jatropha. He sees it as a manner in which Qatar may decrease airline carbon emissions. According to his price quotes, its usage as a jet fuel could lead to about a 40% reduction of “cradle to tomb” emissions.

Alherbawi’s team is conducting ongoing field studies to improve jatropha yields by fertilizing crops with sewage sludge. As an included benefit, he envisages a jatropha green belt spanning 20,000 hectares (nearly 50,000 acres) in Qatar. “The implementation of the green belt can really improve the soil and farming lands, and protect them versus any additional wear and tear brought on by dust storms,” he states.

But the Qatar project’s success still depends upon lots of aspects, not least the capability to acquire quality yields from the tree. Another crucial action, Alherbawi explains, is scaling up production innovation that uses the totality of the jatropha fruit to increase processing efficiency.

Back in Ghana, jOil is presently handling more than 1,300 hectares (1,830 acres) of jatropha, and growing a pilot plot on 300 hectares (740 acres) dealing with more than 400 farmers. Subramanian explains that years of research and development have actually resulted in varieties of jatropha that can now achieve the high yields that were lacking more than a years back.

“We were able to quicken the yield cycle, enhance the yield variety and enhance the fruit-bearing capacity of the tree,” Subramanian states. In essence, he mentions, the tree is now domesticated. “Our very first project is to broaden our jatropha curcas plantation to 20,000 hectares.”

Biofuels aren’t the only application JOil is taking a look at. The fruit and its by-products might be a source of fertilizer, bio-candle wax, a charcoal substitute (important in Africa where much wood is still burned for cooking), and even bioplastics.

But it is the transport sector that still beckons as the ideal biofuels application, according to Subramanian. “The biofuels story has actually as soon as again reopened with the energy transition drive for oil companies and bio-refiners – [driven by] the search for alternative fuels that would be emission friendly.”

A total jatropha life-cycle evaluation has yet to be finished, however he believes that cradle-to-grave greenhouse gas emissions related to the oily plant will be “competitive … These two aspects – that it is technically suitable, and the carbon sequestration – makes it an extremely strong prospect for adoption for … sustainable air travel,” he says. “We believe any such growth will take location, [by clarifying] the meaning of abject land, [enabling] no competitors with food crops, nor in any way threatening food security of any country.”

Where next for jatropha?

Whether jatropha can truly be carbon neutral, environmentally friendly and socially accountable depends upon intricate factors, consisting of where and how it’s grown – whether, for instance, its production design is based in smallholder farms versus industrial-scale plantations, say experts. Then there’s the irritating problem of achieving high yields.

Earlier this year, the Bolivian federal government revealed its intention to pursue jatropha plantations in the Gran Chaco biome, part of a national biofuels push that has actually stirred argument over prospective repercussions. The Gran Chaco’s dry forest biome is already in deep difficulty, having actually been greatly deforested by aggressive agribusiness practices.

Many previous plantations in Ghana, cautions Ahmed, transformed dry savanna woodland, which ended up being bothersome for carbon accounting. “The net carbon was typically unfavorable in many of the jatropha websites, since the carbon sequestration of jatropha can not be compared to that of a shea tree,” he explains.

Other researchers chronicle the “potential of Jatropha curcas as an environmentally benign biodiesel feedstock” in Malaysia, Indonesia and India. But still other scientists stay doubtful of the ecological practicality of second-generation biofuels. “If Mexico promotes biofuels, such as the exploitation of jatropha, the rebound is that it possibly becomes so successful, that we will have a lot of associated land-use change,” says Daniel Itzamna Avila-Ortega, co-founder of the Mexican Center of Industrial Ecology and a Ph.D. trainee with the Stockholm Resilience Centre; he has conducted research study on the possibilities of jatropha contributing to a circular economy in Mexico.

Avila-Ortega cites previous land-use problems associated with expansion of various crops, including oil palm, sugarcane and avocado: “Our law enforcement is so weak that it can not manage the economic sector doing whatever they want, in terms of producing environmental issues.”

Researchers in Mexico are currently exploring jatropha-based animals feed as a low-priced and sustainable replacement for grain. Such uses may be well fit to regional contexts, Avila-Ortega concurs, though he stays concerned about potential ecological costs.

He recommends limiting jatropha growth in Mexico to make it a “crop that dominates land,” growing it only in genuinely poor soils in need of repair. “Jatropha might be among those plants that can grow in really sterile wastelands,” he describes. “That’s the only way I would ever promote it in Mexico – as part of a forest recovery technique for wastelands. Otherwise, the associated issues are greater than the possible advantages.”

Jatropha’s global future stays unsure. And its prospective as a tool in the battle versus environment modification can just be opened, say many experts, by avoiding the list of problems related to its very first boom.

Will jatropha tasks that sputtered to a stop in the early 2000s be fired back up once again? Subramanian believes its function as a sustainable biofuel is “impending” and that the return is on. “We have strong interest from the energy market now,” he says, “to work together with us to develop and broaden the supply chain of jatropha.”

Banner image: Jatropha curcas trees in Hawai’i. Image by Forest and Kim Starr via Flickr (CC BY 2.0).

A liquid biofuels guide: Carbon-cutting hopes vs. real-world effects

Citations:

Wahl, N., Hildebrandt, T., Moser, C., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Averdunk, K., Bailis, R., … Zelt, T. (2012 ). Insights into jatropha projects around the world – Key truths & figures from an international survey. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. doi:10.2139/ ssrn.2254823

Romijn, H., Heijnen, S., Colthoff, J. R., De Jong, B., & Van Eijck, J. (2014 ). Economic and social sustainability efficiency of jatropha tasks: Results from field studies in Mozambique, Tanzania and Mali. Sustainability, 6( 9 ), 6203-6235. doi:10.3390/ su6096203

Trebbin, A. (2021 ). Land grabbing and jatropha in India: An analysis of ‘hyped’ discourse on the topic. Land, 10( 10 ), 1063. doi:10.3390/ land10101063

Van Eijck, J., Romijn, H., Balkema, A., & Faaij, A. (2014 ). Global experience with jatropha growing for bioenergy: An evaluation of socio-economic and environmental aspects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 869-889. doi:10.1016/ j.rser.2014.01.028

Skutsch, M., De los Rios, E., Solis, S., Riegelhaupt, E., Hinojosa, D., Gerfert, S., … Masera, O. (2011 ). Jatropha in Mexico: environmental and social impacts of an incipient biofuel program. Ecology and Society, 16( 4 ). doi:10.5751/ ES-04448-160411

Gmünder, S., Singh, R., Pfister, S., Adheloya, A., & Zah, R. (2012 ). Environmental impacts of Jatropha curcas biodiesel in India. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2012. doi:10.1155/ 2012/623070

Ahmed, A., Jarzebski, M. P., & Gasparatos, A. (2018 ). Using the environment service technique to figure out whether jatropha projects were found in limited lands in Ghana: Implications for website selection. Biomass and Bioenergy, 114, 112-124. doi:10.1016/ j.biombioe.2017.07.020

Achten, W. M., Sharma, N., Muys, B., Mathijs, E., & Vantomme, P. (2014 ). Opportunities and constraints of promoting new tree crops – Lessons gained from jatropha. Sustainability, 6( 6 ), 3213-3231. doi:10.3390/ su6063213

Alherbawi, M., McKay, G., Govindan, R., Haji, M., & Al-Ansari, T. (2022 ). A novel method on the delineation of a multipurpose energy-greenbelt to produce biofuel and fight desertification in deserts. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116223. doi:10.1016/ j.jenvman.2022.116223

Riayatsyah, T. M. I., Sebayang, A. H., Silitonga, A. S., Padli, Y., Fattah, I. M. R., Kusumo, F., … Mahlia, T. M. I. (2022 ). Current progress of Jatropha curcas commoditisation as biodiesel feedstock: A . Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 1019. doi:10.3389/ fenrg.2021.815416

Mokhtar, E. S., Akhir, N. M., Zaki, N. A. M., Muharam, F. M., Pradhan, B., & Lay, U. S. (2021 ). Land suitability for prospective jatropha plantation in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 620( 1 ), 012002. doi:10.1088/ 1755-1315/620/ 1/012002

Chamola, R., Kumar, N., & Jain, S. (2022 ). Jatropha: A sustainable source of transportation fuel in India. In Advancement in Materials, Manufacturing and Energy Engineering, Vol. II: Select Proceedings of ICAMME 2021 (pp. 395-408). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi:10.1007/ 978-981-16-8341-1_32

Peralta, H., Avila-Ortega, D. I., & García-Flores, J. C. (2022 ). Jatropha farm: A circular economy proposal for the non-toxic physic nut crop in Mexico. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 15( 1 ), 10. doi:10.3390/ environsciproc2022015010

Hao, M., Qian, Y., Xie, X., Chen, S., Ding, F., & Ma, T. (2022 ). Global limited land availability of Jatropha curcas L.-based biodiesel advancement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132655. doi:10.1016/ j.jclepro.2022.132655

FEEDBACK: Use this kind to send a message to the author of this post. If you wish to publish a public remark, you can do that at the bottom of the page.

Bottom Promo
Bottom Promo
Top Promo